The Truth About Newspaper And Formguide Tips

If you've ever wondered if the tips in a racebook or formguide are worth much more than a passing glance, the following may just open your eyes a little.

From the late 1980s to the late 1990s I freelanced at different times for Sporting Publications in Sydney. At that time DeFax was supplying formguides to almost every greyhound track in NSW, with something like 40 meetings being put together each week.

In those days, despite computers and data processing, the Internet either didn't exist or, when it finally did, was still very much in its infancy, nothing like the behemoth it is today. With each state running its own database of form, and all in differing styles, it was the fax machine upon which much reliance was placed.

For example, when a Victorian greyhound was engaged at a NSW track, we would contact Greyhound Form and ask them to send a fax of the relevant dogs' form. This would then be added to the NSW database, although usually just the number of starts and placings and the last six or so races in a bit more detail.

The bottom line was that the work of checking each racebook was time intensive, and to supply tips for tracks like Cootamundra, , Broken Hill and the rest meant that in most cases the selections were made at about 30 seconds per race.

I often wondered if the locals who used DeFax took any notice of the selections, because if they were of the belief the picks were the result of lengthy and informed form study, they were sadly mistaken.

The only tracks where was put into the picks were the TAB circuits like Gosford, , , and the like.

Also, a lot more effort was put into the selections for the Wentworth Park Saturday and Monday meetings, where I would go upstairs to the GBOTA office and watch the video replays of the previous couple of meetings.

For me, being a regular at the city meetings meant I knew most of the runners and had a pretty good idea of assessing most races. Even so, the selection process for both meetings had to be completed by the previous Thursday.

The DeFax tips for Saturday night were sent to the Daily Telegraph and appear in the Tipster Poll at the top of the Wentworth Park formguide. I wasn't any better or worse than most; the best I ever managed being seven winners on top, out of 10 races.

Major race finals were, quite often, some of the easiest to assess, and in this regard one race sticks out in my mind, the 1999 final at Wentworth Park.

After the run-offs the race looked as good as over, with Queensland star Faithful Hawk drawn well in box seven. He had the early speed, , and overall run home times to be the deserved favourite. However, when watching the video replays I noticed the dog drawn in box six for the final was a good beginner who veered slightly right at the start. Faithful Hawk jumped to the left, and I thought it would only take a brief 2/100ths of a second ‘prop' by Faithful Hawk at the start to let the only other chance in the race, Hahn Bale (box four), steal enough of a break to lead into the first turn and take the race. I wrote as much in the DeFax and put my money where my mouth was on race night, taking the 5/2 ($3.50) about Hahn Bale.

As the bunny rolled for the start of the Derby final my eyes were glued to the six alley, and, sure enough, it popped out quickly and went slightly right, holding up Faithful Hawk for that vital moment. Hahn Bale began well from box four and led narrowly into the first bend from Faithful Hawk before going on to score by almost five lengths in race record time.

As readers of this website are well aware, the videos of heats and semi-finals are available almost as soon as they are run and can be watched over and over again from the comfort of your own chair. When the field for a final is completed and the box draw done, it is well worth having a look at the heats and noting the way each of the eight finalists begins from the boxes and the line they take in the early part of a race.

The moral of this story is quite simple: make your own judgement and ignore the tipsters. You'll find, over time, your selection processes are just as good, if not better, than many of the so-called ‘experts'.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Tracey
John Tracey
10 years ago

Hi Duncan
Did you do any stats on the percentage loss/gain of tipsters percentages. We got some American Figures for their race tipsters on tracks (tipping cards) and they were working out at up to 40% loss when the take out was  24%..

duncanstearn
duncanstearn
10 years ago

John Tracey  Hi John, No I didn’t do any figures in terms of profitability, or otherwise, for tipsters. I think you’ll find, in general, most newspaper guys are tipping the favourite, not necessarily intentionally, but simply because that is the dog which does indeed, at first glance, appear the best in the race.  The big problem for tipsters is they are forced to make selections for every race…and most of these guys, who usually have a bet as well, will probably avoid betting in half the races they’ve been compelled to tip in because the races look too much like… Read more »

John Tracey
John Tracey
10 years ago

Hi Duncan

Did you do any stats on the percentage loss/gain of tipsters percentages. We got some American Figures for their race tipsters on tracks (tipping cards) and they were working out at up to 40% loss when the take out was  24%.. 

duncanstearn
duncanstearn
10 years ago

John Tracey  Hi John, No I didn’t do any figures in terms of profitability, or otherwise, for tipsters. I think you’ll find, in general, most newspaper guys are tipping the favourite, not necessarily intentionally, but simply because that is the dog which does indeed, at first glance, appear the best in the race.  The big problem for tipsters is they are forced to make selections for every race…and most of these guys, who usually have a bet as well, will probably avoid betting in half the races they’ve been compelled to tip in because the races look too much like… Read more »