Brenton Scott responds to concerns facing NSW industry

NSW greyhound racing

THE head of the NSW Greyhound Racing Industry Alliance has called for participants to stay optimistic despite recent criticism of the NSW government following the repeal of the greyhound racing prohibition bill.

The industry has been divided since the ban was officially overturned earlier this month, the government announcing at the same time that it would be providing $41 million in funding over a five-year period to help with industry reforms.

The funding followed the report from the NSW Greyhound Industry Reform Panel which made a series of recommendations on how the industry can improve – including the separation of the commercial and regulatory aspects of the business.

Despite the funding announcement, some participants and politicians, who have championed the greyhound cause in NSW believe the industry cannot survive without a renegotiation of the intercode and tax parity agreements.

Last week, Australian Racing Greyhound released a series of figures estimating the true costs of greyhound racing reform which approximated that the industry could be losing up to $24 million per annum.

But Alliance boss Brenton Scott said the funding was a step in the right direction and a springboard to a successful future for greyhound racing in NSW.

“I have considerable faith in the reform panel recommendations ensuring that the industry has the right personnel in place to oversee the operations of the Commission and Commercial entity,” Scott, who is also the CEO of the NSW Greyhound Breeders, Owners and Trainers Association, said.

“I believe the industry will, in the future, be strategically driven with a clear vision and the collective will to pursue this vision relentlessly and without compromise.
“Whilst the Government’s support package is appreciated, the NSW GBOTA and Alliance position was obviously to advocate for equitable recurrent funding, consistent with the recommendations.

“Of course, the NSW GBOTA and Alliance were not the only forces seeking a better outcome. Many individuals took the time to respond to the recommendations and to lobby politicians.
“All who made contributions over the past nine months will view the support package as a step in right direction but not an outcome that deals with the ongoing recurrent funding needs.
“I do not think it is unreasonable, however, to believe that the industry can extract further value in the future from the political relationships, across the full parliamentary system, that are now in place.

“The Hansard comments of the Minister, the Shadow Minister, Kevin Humphries, Peter Primrose etc., by any fair assessment, clearly indicate that there is both political awareness and sympathy for the recurrent funding disadvantage incurred by the greyhound industry as a result of cross code subsidization caused by both the Inter-code Deed and Tax harmonization payments.
“The public comments of the Racing Minister in support of future partnering remain significant. And I don’t under-value the fact that Labor, Shooters, Fishers and Farmers and the Christian Democrats were prepared to support an amendment to the legislation, which committed to more funding.”

Scott said there are numerous challenges facing the industry, but urged participants to stay positive and embrace reforms.

“The NSW GBOTA and the Alliance have supported the need for industry reform, the right for the industry to have the commercial autonomy so as to ensure its controls its operational footprint and a fair funding model.
“The adoption of best practice, regulation, governance and animal welfare standards were, and are, crucial if we are to assure ourselves that the industry’s reputation will never again be put at risk.
“The challenges before industry are to (a) ensure the reform undertakings are put in place as cost efficiently as possible whilst (b) ensuring we maximise our revenue returns and (c) maximising the prizemoney per greyhound ratio.
“Given where we were at on July 7, 2016, I believe the industry has collectively made outstanding progress during the past eight months.

“I think now is a time for optimism, a time for confidence in our future capacity.

“The industry’s deep seated commitment to reform is respected by the parliamentary system. Our political relationships are strong and meaningful.

“We will have a commercial entity properly geared to drive industry strategy and efficiency. Whilst there is more to be done, the industry should view its collective efforts and resilience of the past nine months with some pride.

“It was always our intention to lay a foundation for an ethical and sustainable future… that foundation is in place and the building now begins.”

Got feedback? Join the discussion Hide Comments

  1. This bloke is expecting that things will turn out ok ? Participants here in NSW are looking at being starved to death Financially ! This bloke had us believe that the ICA was a fair outcome some 18 years ago and also was not keen on the Rally, used government lobbyist for advice re the Ban, what happened there, go to Court, result still waiting to hear ?. Don’t be fooled, we all chipped in Financially too, A lot of participants are saying he is positioning himself for a GIG in the new structure and if that’s the case the end will come sooner rather then later, as a former CEO stated he is unemployable at that level here in NSW and maybe he should try his luck where he resides in South Australia .He is the last person to offer on advice on staying optimistic ? Remember he was part of the Panel with what we have today so in real terms we where sold out again just like he did with the inter-code agreement …I remember when ask that question re the (ICA) at the Select Committee Inquiry at Penrith he broke down and cried and then he ask could he take that question on notice, so draw your own conclusion.

  2. I seriously wonder what colour the sky is in Scott’s world, I nominate him and the Alliance for the Walter Mitty Award.

  3. Todman some people just don’t learn ? when these great leaders of the codes got together to decide who gets what, from the Inter-code they all had the same solicitor ! We got less then what we where earning ?How Bizarre ! now he’s beating chest after accepting 41 million to kick start the industry,I like many others are not fooled by this spin, Being Open and Transparent BULL SHIT.

  4. The ONLY person that KNEW it was a 99 year, common law “contract” was the big "V’

  5. Big “V” has even got bigger since when he was only the mouth for the 'Red Hots"and got overs for them in this 99 year sellout by our own Mob, lets never forget !

  6. Those who say the ICD cannot be changed read point 64 in McHugh’s report Parliament can legislate to change the percentages.

  7. I think any decent lawyer would be able to question the validity of a so called 99 year common law “contract” that is blatantly unfair. If the government can wipe out an industry using a facebook post - don’t tell me they cannot do anything about this funding arrangement.

  8. When the 'proffessor" was in charge, I emailed him to advise that there was the possibility of a cancellation under common law, due to “mistake” by one party due to the non disclosure of fact.
    I’m no lawyer, but it did seem at the time there was some possibility.
    No reply was ever received
    Sadly I lost all my emails, when my computer was hacked

  9. It might have been the" proffessor & boy blunder " who hacked you computer?

  10. No way, they are not going to upset Pete and John who are joined at the hip over a few percentage points