Foley’s Parliament speech on greyhound ban is essential reading

AMIDST the most challenging period in the history of greyhound racing, an unlikely hero has emerged with a goal to rebuild and repair the sport.

New South Wales Opposition Leader Luke Foley has gone above and beyond in his plight to reform greyhound racing, with Labor forming an unlikely alliance with the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party and the Christian Democrat Party.

Foley has been the main man for the industry inside the walls of Macquarie Street, with his support culminating on Tuesday night with a speech lasting over two hours.

Speaking with hard facts and passion, Foley’s speech delivered a strong message to Parliament regarding the impacts of the ban on the innocent men and women within greyhound racing.

While Baird and Grant’s legislation to outlaw the sport as of July 1, 2017, was ultimately passed by the coalition’s cohort of MPs willing to tow the party line on Tuesday night, Foley’s speech is still one which should be read by everyone sitting on either side of the debate.

“The Premier is breaking the hearts of thousands of good men and women across this State,” Foley said, beginning his speech just after 4pm.

“I make it clear at the outset that the Labor Opposition utterly opposes this bill.

“There has been a lot of talk about principles in this place in recent weeks. The Premier anticipated this debate today with his own effort in question time when he got seven minutes. He talks about principle. Let me outline at the start the three principles that the Labor Party brings to this debate.

“First, governments and parliaments ought not engage in collective punishment of an entire group of people in response to the sins of a few members of that group. That is a principle that, until six weeks ago, I thought both major parties in New South Wales were committed to.

“The second principle we bring to this debate is that an entire industry should not be outlawed, declared illegal, unless all reasonable and genuine efforts have been made to regulate its antisocial features.

“The third principle we bring to this debate is the principle that our party has stood for in this Parliament since Labor members first entered it 125 years ago at the 1891 election: working‑class people and communities deserve respect and fair treatment at all times.

“They are the principles that the Labor Party brings to this debate and that is why we are totally opposed to this legislation, which will criminalise an industry, a sport and an Australian way of life, and shut down greyhound racing on and from 1 July 2017.”

The MP for Auburn, Foley condemned the Baird government’s decision to ban greyhound racing based on the actions of a few, effectively demonising every person with a collar and lead in-hand.

“What we have here is the extraordinary intervention by the State—a Coalition Government, with the Liberal Party as the largest party in that coalition—taking away property rights, closing down private business activity and closing down an industry that contributes $335 million per annum to the State’s economy.

“If a Labor Government did it there would be cries of socialism and communism ringing from those opposite and their cheer squad in the media. Yet here we have a Liberal Premier—a leader of a party that claims to champion private enterprise and the private sector economy—with the stroke of a pen or, more accurately, with the click of a keyboard to put it on Facebook, wiping out an entire industry, outlawing it, declaring it illegal.

“The normal processes of the criminal law seek to deal with those who have done the wrong thing and punish those whose guilt is established beyond reasonable doubt. Of course, that should occur when it comes to anyone doing the wrong thing in the greyhound racing industry—that is the normal process of the law.

“But why this collective punishment of the overwhelming majority of participants in this sport and industry who have only ever done the right thing as though they are live baiters and as though they engage in animal cruelty?

“They do not, they have not and there is no evidence to suggest they have. Even if one agrees with the conclusion of Justice McHugh, one then has to believe that 80 to 90 per cent of trainers have never engaged in the barbaric practice of live baiting.

“But instead of allowing the criminal law to punish the guilty—those whose guilt is proved through our legal processes beyond reasonable doubt—the Government introduces the most draconian legislation that punishes everyone in that industry, the thousands of participants.

“Further, this legislation punishes all those who derive a livelihood indirectly from the operation of this industry in New South Wales.”

The Baird Government was also slammed for its advertising campaign, which was funded by tax payer’s money with the intentions of demonising greyhound racing, with many of the ‘facts’ mentioned since being disproven.

“Those ads are Government propaganda, pure and simple, to combat citizens who have dared to stand up and defend themselves. That is all they have done.

“The peak industry body, Greyhound Racing NSW, has been muzzled. It has not been allowed to stand up for the people in the industry, so the people themselves, faced with the destruction of their livelihoods and their entire way of life, their recreational pastime and passion, had to come together and find a way to put their case to their fellow citizens and influence public opinion.

“They have done that—led by Brenton Scott from the Greyhound Breeders, Owners and Trainers Association, who, with very limited resources, has done the most marvellous work over the past six weeks with participants from all the greyhound racing clubs in New South Wales.

“What do they cop for daring to speak up for themselves? They get a tsunami of Government propaganda—and, just to add insult to injury, it is paid for by their taxes.

“We hear today $1 million; we will see where it stops. I suspect in the end it will cost a darn sight more than that for a propaganda campaign to combat citizens who speak up for themselves.

“This is life in Mike Baird’s New South Wales. Once this bloke makes his mind up, do not argue with him. You will not change his mind and he will use your taxes to run a propaganda campaign against you.

“The print and radio promotions state that up to 70 per cent of greyhounds are deemed to be wastage by the industry and that 4,074 dogs are slaughtered each year. But the numbers brought to the table by industry participants show that those figures are overblown.

“The Government further demonises the industry in its ads by saying, ‘Due to its systemic cruelty greyhound racing is only legal in eight countries, with a majority of the states in the United States of America having imposed a ban’.

“In fact, only two American states have imposed a ban. There has never been a time when the majority of states in the United States of America have conducted greyhound racing, but the only states to have outlawed the sport are Idaho and Arizona.

“Do not let the facts get in the way of a taxpayer-funded propaganda campaign. The ads proclaim that 136 greyhounds die racing every year—with a little marked cross for dramatic effect in this propaganda advertising.

“Between 1 January and 21 March 2016 only two greyhounds suffered catastrophic injury, yet it was reported as fact that 136 die every year.

“This is what the Government has resorted to in an effort to shape public opinion because there is widespread community concern that an entire group in society is being treated in this way.

“In an interview with the Daily Telegraph the Premier is reported to have said, ‘Greyhound racing is shrinking, the number of participants, the attendance, the economics. It’s down to eight countries. It’s now going to be down to four states in America.’

“Is it? When the special commission of inquiry commenced its work last year greyhound racing in the United States was taking place in Alabama, Arizona, Iowa, Florida, Texas and West Virginia. That is six states, not four—just bump it up by 50 per cent because, as the Premier of New South Wales, you make it up as you go along.

“As I said, do not let the facts get in the way of a good argument. And even if what the Premier said is true, what relevance does it have to greyhound racing in New South Wales?

“The Premier tells us constantly that this industry is in terminal decline. I am aware of market research that says that people who bet on greyhound racing are, on average, around 10 years younger than those who bet on thoroughbred and harness racing. I was surprised when I first heard that.

“Indeed, it may challenge the assumption that some of us had that this was a sport followed by older Australians in the main—namely, those 300,000 people who bet on greyhound racing in our State each year are, on average, up to 10 years younger than those who bet on the horses. Is it an industry in decline?”

Foley lamented that the closure of the industry would be a sad day for the greyhound breed itself, with the majestic animal born to chase dating back through history. The only species of dog mentioned in the bible, the greyhound has roots in Europe and even accompanied Captain Cook and Joseph Banks to the shores of Australia aboard the Endeavour in 1770.

Foley has vowed to continue the fight to save greyhound racing, even if that means re-introducing it if he wins the next state election in 2019.

Foley explained in his speech that the industry had been formerly banned in NSW before making a resurgence three years later with the help of another member for Auburn, Premier Jack Lang.

“The regulation of greyhound racing occurred in 1927. The Greyhound Coursing Association was set up by Frederick “Judge” Swindell and the prominent retailers Hugh Foy and Anthony Hordern. Crowds of up to 30,000 working-class punters would be at the racetrack to bet on dogs chasing mechanical lures, known as tin hare racing.

“It goes back to 1927 because this State has seen before a wowser Premier outlawing greyhound racing—the Tories did it in 1928. Anglican clergy denounced the new sport “as a pastime that bred parasites”, accusing men of neglecting their families to gamble at the track, so a conservative Premier outlawed it.

“Three years later Labor Premier Jack Lang, the member for Auburn, brought back greyhound racing and placed it on a proper regulatory footing in New South Wales, so we have been here before. In 1932 racing started at Wentworth Park in Glebe.

“There is a long history when it comes to the place of greyhounds in our society, the life of Australia and the presence of a sport subject to regulatory control in our State.”

Justice Michael McHugh’s report from the Special Commission of Inquiry was also referenced by the Leader of the Opposition, with Foley noting that many aspects of the report have been scrutinised by the industry who are currently fighting in the Supreme Court to have it declared invalid.

“The stated justification from our Premier and Deputy Premier for this bill is the report of this special commission of inquiry.

“Many of the conclusions reached by the special commission of inquiry are heavily contested. The Opposition objects to an announcement of a ban without any natural justice being afforded to the participants in the greyhound industry.

“They ought to be allowed to put their case and their arguments and have them tested, scrutinised and debated before any decision is taken.”

In Particular, Foley questioned why submissions by former Greyhound Racing NSW (GRNSW) Chairman Percy Allan never made it into the Commission’s report, with Allan detailing to The Weekend Australian that he had provided an alternative model to show a way to achieve zero wastage.

“Wastage is one of the three key planks the Premier relies on to advocate for a ban on greyhound racing in New South Wales, yet a distinguished former Secretary of the Treasury states that he presented detailed modelling to show that greyhound racing could be regulated to ensure close to zero wastage rather than being banned.

“Ought that not form part of the consideration and debate about whether greyhound racing has a future in New South Wales? Of course it should. Percy Allan is no mug. His submission ought to have formed part of the consideration by the special commission of inquiry and informed the subsequent debate.”

Foley probed the Commission’s claims that greyhound racing had lost its social licence, pondering what that actually means.

“This is an imprecise concept. It has never been defined. Licences are issued by the State in many industries. A social licence is not something that has been issued by this Parliament, yet it is being used as justification for the outlawing of an industry.

“Perhaps members ought to have a discussion in Parliament about what a social licence is. What is the concept that is often used in the community by advocates to ban all sorts of activities?

“What is the Parliament’s definition of a social licence? How does one gain one? How does one lose one? Can one be regained if it has been lost? The statement has been made that greyhound racing has lost its social licence and that the industry ought to be wiped out.

“Please tell us how one gains or loses a social licence. The concept is intangible. It is unwritten. It must be distinguished from a statutory licence, which is tangible and in written form. It can be defined; it can be measured. It is not so for a social licence.

“In the history of debates in the New South Wales Parliament I cannot find an example of the absence or loss of a social licence being used to justify a decision to shut down an industry. I hazard a guess that it has been used in the other places by the Greens in private members’ bills that they have introduced to shut down all sorts of activity. I am unaware of the Parliament ever passing legislation on the basis of the revocation or loss of a social licence, yet that is occurring in this chamber.

“We are, presumably, to take at face value the statement that greyhound racing has lost its social licence and will be shut down as of July next year. I do not accept that. Please tell me when and how the industry lost it, how it is measured and how it can be regained.

“My point is that this is an undefined concept that cannot be measured or owned. We need to do better than that. By all means, let us have a debate about a social licence. Let us have a debate in the community and in the Parliament about a social licence, but we must afford the participants in the industry a chance to put their case before we declare that they have lost their social licence.”

Foley also mentioned the Labor Party’s proposal to reform the industry based on recommendation’s two through to 80 from the Special Commission report with a high focus on animal welfare, life bans for anyone engaged in animal cruelty and an improved regulatory structure to ensure integrity is maintained .

Foley argued that the greyhound racing industry should not be isolated and banned based on the actions of a few, with no compensation mentioned in the legislation for those who are set to lose their livelihoods due to the legislation.

“One industry ought not be singled out for special treatment. That is what the Government is suggesting we do. It is bending over backwards, through the Deputy Premier and the Minister for Primary Industries, to say that no-one in any other industry that deals with animals has anything to worry about because it will not do anything to them.

“That is the stated intention of the Government. The people in the greyhound racing industry have every right to say, “Why are we alone being picked on?”

“The State Government uses sentient animals in experimentation and research activity. The Premier, who writes emotional Facebook posts about the slaughter of greyhounds, presides over experimentation and research activity that uses dogs as guinea pigs.

“The Premier’s Government formally approved the use of 3,890 dogs for experimentation and research last year. It approved the use of 3,093 dogs in 2013-14 and 3,655 in 2012‑13 through its Animal Research Review Panel, an agency that reports directly to the Minister for Primary Industries. We talk about live baiting.

“This Government approved the use of more than 1,830 rabbits for research and experiments last year, resulting in the death of 88. Pigs, cats, cattle, horses and sheep were also approved for use in research.

“We must lift standards across the board in industries that use animals on a daily basis. We on this side of the House are opposed to the selective moral outrage that is on display here and that singles out only those involved in the sport of greyhound racing.

“There has been a lot of talk about animal welfare, and I have spent some time addressing those concerns. I turn now to human welfare, the welfare of the people who participate in greyhound racing. The legislation is extreme in its callous disregard for working people, people who derive their livelihood from greyhound racing.

“The bill expressly provides, in clause 29, that no compensation is to be paid.

“Of course, nothing in the way of assistance or compensation has been brought to this debate. The Premier, who ambushed these people, just tells them to trust him; he will look after them in the long run. Well, I think the participants in the industry have learnt one thing for sure—they cannot trust this Premier to look after their interests.”

Foley closed his speech by stating that the outlawing of greyhound racing will set a precedent for other industries and that it seemed an unfair punishment for those within the sport who are completely innocent.

“Greyhound racing is an activity in which a minority of our citizens participate but I have a message for the majority of New South Wales citizens who, let us face it, do not care passionately about the future of greyhound racing. If the Government can do it to these people it can do it to anyone.

“Think about what is our passion in life, our recreational pastime, our industry. If the Government gets away with legislating to outlaw and criminalise a sport, industry and way of life in this country it can do the same to any of our interests.

“I reflect that the great Australian historian Manning Clark talked about the punishers and straighteners in our public life. I think Premier Baird has become the great punisher and straightener in Australia’s national life. If he does not like our way of life he will impose his moral choices on us.”

Past Discussion

  1. ‘Luke Foley’, the very rare modern day statesman. The last real statesman i remember was the big man ‘Hon Jack Lang’ in the 1930s.

    Look after Luke Foley NSW.

  2. The Great Jack Lang would be proud of Luke Foley’s support of the  battlers in this state, which is run by a dicktator Baird! The definition  of a dicktator i s one that walks around with a spud on the end of their d**k

  3. and under duress of a heavy cold as well.

    so eloquent that speech. very impressed with that man.

    hope is genuine though….he is a pollie.

  4. The speech was essentially written for Foley by the greyhound racing industry. It included every misinformed talking point, every bogus “fact”, and every long-debunked myth that have populated the industry’s social media and chat forum pages, as well as the endless newspaper articles and editorials produced by the industry’s loyal stenographers and radio mouthpieces. No wonder you love it. 

  5. STATE POLITICS

    Turnbull slams Baird ban on greyhound racing

    Malcolm Turnbull has called the Baird government’s greyhoundban an ‘over-reaction’.

    The Australian12:00AM August 26, 2016

    SARAH MARTIN

    Political reporterCanberra

    @msmarto

    Malcolm Turnbull criticised the NSW Liberal government at aprivate dinner in Perth for shutting down the greyhound industry, suggestingthe shock move was an “over-reaction”.

    As the industry in NSW reels from Premier Mike Baird’sdecision to end the sport, The Australian can reveal the Prime Ministerexpressed concern about the move, legislated this week through the GreyhoundRacing Prohibition bill.

    MPs who attended a dinner with Mr Turnbull at the Chophousesteak restaurant early this month have told The Australian the Prime Ministerexpressed the view that closing down the industry in response to animal-welfareconcerns was not a proportionate response.

    He is understood to have told MPs he believed outrage overtreatment of rabbits used in live baiting — a key ­reason for the industrylosing political support — was surprising, given that rabbits were a feral pestand were regularly shot and poisoned.

    It is understood Mr Turnbull expressed his “surprise” and“concern” at Mr Baird’s decision to ban the sport in response to ­issues raisedduring a commission of inquiry into the NSW greyhound racing industry.

    “He was critical of the decision and the message was, ‘If weare shutting down an industry on the basis of what happens to rabbits, well, weare not very nice to rabbits in this country; they are a pest’,” one MP said.

    “It was Malcolm Turnbull the farmer talking.”

    Another MP made clear that Mr Turnbull was not indicatingsupport for live baiting, but confirmed he had criticised how the stategovernment had handled the issue.

    The special commission of inquiry claimed it had foundevidence of systemic animal cruelty, including mass greyhound killings and livebaiting. The report, which drew on material which has been heavily contested,said the state’s industry had “fundamental animal welfare issues, integrity andgovernance failings that cannot be remedied”.

    Under the new legislation, anyone caught organising a racefaces a one-year jail sentence and a maximum ,000 fine.

    The proposed laws did not win uniform support from withinthe NSW government, with state Nationals MPs Katrina Hodgkinson, Chris Gulaptisand Kevin Humphries choosing to side with Labor to oppose the controversialbill.

    Another MP at the dinner, which took place on the eve of theWA Liberal conference on August 5, said there were few federal parliamentarianswho supported the Baird government’s decision, and they were pleased that MrTurnbull “got it”.

    Mr Baird said in July that “as a humane and responsiblegovernment” he had no choice but to shut down the industry

    IS THE BAIRD ACHILLES HEAL BEGINNING TO EXPOSE ITSELF?

    ATTACK TURNBULL NOW TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST BAIRD………..BEHIND THE USUAL CLOSED DOORS OF PARLIAMENT…..THAT IS NORMAL,AND THREATEN HIM NOT TO BRING DOWN THE LIBERAL GOVERNMENT.

  6. IMPORTANT NOTE….

    I am seeing a lot of our dog mates in NSW struggling with determinations based in Victoria.

    seeking movement to Victoria is not a real big issue people,unless you are bringing a massive set-up to be based here. a PAW style business will definitely struggle to be licensed here, but I can tell you,the hobbyist trainer,with a basic family set-up and small teams(even up to 12 dogs say will be gladly accepted into outer regional zones.

    areas like LARA/DEVON MEADOWS etc; will struggle to allow more licences to be granted,even though they are dog zones.

    if you can afford those zones,and a licence is attached in the sale of the residence for dogs,you will be fine. maybe some red tape crap but it will be fine.

    other zones like our big regional capitals of BALLARAT/GIPPSLAND/BENDIGO/WARRNAMBOOL(GEELONG????) etc; will welcome families to these areas and these zones are well set up for dogs and education and health.

    one must first seek consultation with each council in these zones,but I can assure(cant guarantee of course) that done correctly,your family will be welcomed with open arms.

    but laws of the local councils may differ from your usual understanding in NSW, so seek advice from the zone council you select.

    all regional zones,the main ones have their own tracks and basically within 2 hours of the central city tracks of meadows/sandown.

    do a reconniassence first before any movement thoughts, seek help from GRV and do what instructed,and you are just like any family moving from a zone to another.

    you may also need to look at a DUAL LICENCE…….NSW & VICTORIAN.

    I believe all states head bosses are meeting in SOUTH AUSTRALIA today,and these decisions will be raised for sure.

    I would move on seeing if you can apply for a Victorian licence now. don’t know how it will go,but a chat with the integrity division will get your answers.

  7. huge rumblings in BAIRD government.

    that Achilles heal I talked about has been struck and the master mouth is a gonner.

    trust me,the internal faction, from my whisperers,is that BAIRD/GRANT are being attacked by their own.

    and if it wasn’t doubted before the bill was passed,it certainly was signed,sealed and nearly delivered when he openly admitted HE DID NOT CARE IF HE GOT VOTED OUT,and this I am told was the last straw.

    plus many were disturbed by threats to members of loss of finances for there electorate. one only has to watch the parliament live feed to see who I am refering to. that did not go down with the emany hard cased members.

    internal faction fighting is like an all-in-brawl in there now,and eventually will come out into the public notice.

    the day of reckoning is coming.

  8. Unfortunately these are the same three fallacious arguments the racing industry has been making for years to justify the commodification of innocent living creatures. The first two are simply variations on the old “bad apples” argument that seeks to deflect attention from the core of racing and that is bringing dogs into the world for the sole purpose of earning their owners money and discarding them in the most cost effective way when they can no longer perform that function. This has resulted in the unnecessary suffering, injury and needless deaths of thousands of greyhounds over the years. The third is an attempt to change the dynamic of the argument from the innate cruelty of the industry to a class struggle which then sifts the focus from the suffering of the greyhounds to a supposed attack on the values of hard work and family. Tell me, which family value is it that condones breeding animals to use basically as poker chips and then discarding them when you have a losing hand?

    I am a Board member of Grey2K USA Worldwide, an organization that fights to save these marvelous creatures all over the globe. (you can learn more about us here: http://www.grey2kusa.org/index... I have fostered and adopted rescued racing greyhounds since 1995. I am elated that soon no more greyhounds will suffer and die at NSW tracks and I fully understand the importance of treating industry people with fairness and  compassion as they transition out, considerations, ironically, that were never accorded to the dogs they exploited.
    Fred Barton
    Board Member
    Grey2K USA Worldwide

  9. Adam Marshall has been made parliamentary secretary after Chris and Katrina were punished for supporting their communities. Grant states Marshall  will bring a new focus to regional NSW. What stupidity, drink driving and speeding?

  10. Deborah555 hear,hear.

    support dog rooters,support drunks,threaten old men, sack women,threaten your staff………..not looking good for BAIRD.

    I hope my info is right on,as after KATRINA & CHRIS were bullied out by a media loving ex cop and his ministry hopeful yodeller,the hardened politicians are rumbling in at MAQUARRIE ST, and that rumbling is getting louder and louder…..

    to dismiss two honest speak from the heart pollies has,and will be,the straw that broke the camels back.

    the tough pollies are already rumbling that this is not what they wanted,and now good people are burned for being honest…no way,they are gearing up for a full blown attack. it is coming.

    hey think of this.

    every other member under HUEY AND DUEY will now be thinking.”when I have something to raise that I believe needs raising,i cant because if HUEY AND DUEY don’t agree,they will rid me”

    damned if they do,sacked if they don’t. what a compromise to be in. wont last to long running a house like that.

    we shall see what happens soon.

  11. BobWhitelaw Deborah555  Chris is the member for the electorate I live in and he will get my vote regardless- his support of his community goes well beyond the greyhound track he is a top bloke who really does care about all his constituents. Not often do I disregard party politics but sometimes a politician has to be assessed by their personal worth not their party a bit like Peter Phelps top bloke shyt party.